Malmesbury Roman coins – why were they buried?

Gazette and Herald

A hoard of Roman coins now on display in Malmesbury has perplexed staff at the Athelstan Museum.

The stash was discovered in a field in Milbourne two years ago and has now been cleaned up and given to the museum.

Chairman of the Friends of Athelstan Museum, Roger Griffin, is puzzled as to the purpose of the collection.

He said: “These coins aren’t the equivalent of £20 notes. They are quite small coins, like loose change really.

“They might have been the savings of a slave waiting for his release or possibly a child’s pocket money. They certainly were a poor person’s hoard.”

At first, 24 coins were found scattered over a small area and later a further 14 coins were found.

The coins, known as nummi, date from 305 to 325 AD but there are none in the seven years from 313 to 320.

Mr Griffin said: “We’re not sure why there is a gap, maybe the owner went away for seven years and then came back.

“If it was a child’s pocket money then they would have been saving for quite some time.

“It’s amazing to think that 1,700 years ago there was someone in Malmesbury hiding away these coins.”

The field of coins is half a mile from the site of a Roman villa found three years ago, suggesting the area was well populated during Roman times.

Mr Griffin said: “It wasn’t just Bath and Cirencester that was occupied by the Romans.

“This whole area was heavily occupied and there was a significant amount of activity in Malmesbury itself.

“There have been quite a few finds of Roman pottery, buckles and coins.”

He added: “In 2006 an Iron Age ditch was found in Abbey Row when gas pipes were being laid.

“There was quite a bit of pottery found.

“A Roman denarius was found by the walls of Malmesbury a few years ago.

“It makes you wonder what else is still in the ground waiting to be discovered.”

The coins will go on display at Athelstan Museum in Cross Hayes until next month.

Then they will return to the museum as part of The Festival of British Archaeology from July 18 to August 2. This will also include items from a 2006 dig at Rodbourne Bottom.

Dies rubrorum nasorum


We may admire the satires of Horace and Lucilius, but the ancient Romans haven’t hitherto been thought of as masters of the one-liner. This could be about to change, however, after the discovery of a classical joke book.

Celebrated classics professor Mary Beard has brought to light a volume more than 1,600 years old, which she says shows the Romans not to be the “pompous, bridge-building toga wearers” they’re often seen as, but rather a race ready to laugh at themselves.

Written in Greek, Philogelos, or The Laughter Lover, dates to the third or fourth century AD, and contains some 260 jokes which Beard said are “very similar” to the jokes we have today, although peopled with different stereotypes – the “egghead”, or absent-minded professor, is a particular figure of fun, along with the eunuch, and people with hernias or bad breath.

“They’re also poking fun at certain types of foreigners – people from Abdera, a city in Thrace, were very, very stupid, almost as stupid as [they thought] eggheads [were],” said Beard.

An ancient version of Monty Python’s dead parrot sketch sees a man buy a slave, who dies shortly afterwards. When he complains to the seller, he is told: “He didn’t die when I owned him.”

Beard’s favourite joke is a version of the Englishman, Irishman, Scotsman variety, with a barber, a bald man and an absent-minded professor taking a journey together. They have to camp overnight, so decide to take turns watching the luggage. When it’s the barber’s turn, he gets bored, so amuses himself by shaving the head of the professor. When the professor is woken up for his shift, he feels his head, and says “How stupid is that barber? He’s woken up the bald man instead of me.”

“It’s one of the better ones,” said Beard. “It has a nice identity resonance … A lot of the jokes play on the obviously quite problematic idea in Roman times of knowing who you are.” Another “identity” joke sees a man meet an acquaintance and say “it’s funny, I was told you were dead”. He says “well, you can see I’m still alive.” But the first man disputes this on the grounds that “the man who told me you were dead is much more reliable than you”.

“Interestingly they are quite understandable to us, whereas reading Punch from the 19th century is completely baffling to me,” said Beard.

But she queried whether we are finding the same things funny as the Romans would have done. Telling a joke to one of her graduate classes, in which an absent-minded professor is asked by a friend to bring back two 15-year-old slave boys from his trip abroad, and replies “fine, and if I can’t find two 15-year-olds I will bring you one 30-year-old,” she found they “chortled no end”.

“They thought it was a sex joke, equivalent to someone being asked for two 30-year-old women, and being told okay, I’ll bring you one 60-year-old. But I suspect it’s a joke about numbers – are numbers real? If so two 15-year-olds should be like one 30-year-old – it’s about the strange unnaturalness of the number system.”

Beard, who discovered the title while carrying out research for a new book she’s working on about humour in the ancient world, pointed out that when we’re told a joke, we make a huge effort to make it funny for ourselves, or it’s an admission of failure. “Are we doing that to these Roman jokes? Were they actually laughing at something quite different?” .

See also Daily Telegraph