"I could have hugged Stephen Fry!"

This e-mail has just arrived from a Classics teacher, and is worth sharing:

I went on Saturday (May 28th) to hear Stephen Fry at the Hay-on-Wye Festival (it's not very far for me). He spoke about two films – 'Dr. Strangelove' and 'The Importance of being Earnest.' There were about 1000 people in the audience and he gave a 10 minute eulogy on the benefits of a classical education. I could have hugged him. His main point was that the beauty of Oscar Wilde's language was because he was a Classicist and, therefore, had such command of rhetoric. Michael Wood was also brilliant about the importance of myth.

Advertisements

natural_history_of_latin.jpg

A Natural History of Latin – review

Did I miss this one when it came out in November 2004? It looks good, judging by the extracts on Amazon

This is the blurb:

No known language, including English, has achieved the success and longevity of Latin. French, Spanish, Italian, and Romanian are among its direct descendants, and countless Latin words and phrases comprise the cornerstone of English itself. A Natural History or Latin tells its history from its origins over 2500 years ago to the present. Brilliantly conceived, popularizing but authoritative, and written with the fluency and light touch that have made Tore Janson's Speak so attractive to tens of thousands of readers, it is a masterpiece of adroit synthesis. The book commences with a description of the origins, emergence, and dominance of Latin over the Classical period. Then follows an account of its survival through the Middle Ages into modern times, with emphasis on its evolution throughout the history, culture, and religious practices of Medieval Europe. By judicious quotation of Latin words, phrases, and texts the author illustrates how the written and spoken language changed, region by region over time; how it met resistance from native languages; and how therefore some entire languages disappeared. Janson offers a vivid demonstration of the value of Latin as a means of access to a vibrant past and a persuasive argument for its continued worth. A concise and easy-to-understand introduction to Latin grammar and a list of the most frequent Latin words, including 500 idioms and phrases still in common use, complement the work.

The journal Christianity Today has an article (noted by Explorator) based on the book. I can't reproduce it here – copyright – but I hope they won't mind my quoting a brilliant extract:

As I put it to my students, if Yiddish were erased from contemporary English we'd have a hard time talking about bagels, pastrami, klutzes, and schmucks. If we dumped Dutch, we'd be without cookies, Yankees, bundles, and booms. If we bid au revoir to Hindi, we'd be at a loss when contemplating bandannas, cheetahs, jungles, and shampoo. If we said aloha to Congolese we'd have a tough time ruminating on funky gorillas, zebra zombies, and mojo boogie. Sans Arabic, we wouldn't know about algebra, algorithms, and almanacs. But if Latin died in our mouths, we'd just stop talking; or, at best, we'd be left mostly with monosyllables bequeathed to us from the Angles and Saxons—requiem aeternum dona eis, Domine.

A new blog to watch? And a trailer.

A blog on the Religions of the Ancient Mediterranean has just begun (first post on 28th May) and is already deep in child sacrifice. Thanks to David Meadows and Explorator for this news.

Visit the blog here.

While on the subject of ancient religion, the answer to the question pupils occasionally ask, “Do people still worship Greek gods?” is here. The worshippers of Zeus have a web site and you can watch 1 minute 44 seconds of trailer for a documentary about them and their struggle to have legal freedom in Greece to pursue the traditional religion.

Ancient Roman food – and winemaking – recreated

Thanks to Explorator I've been looking at these really interesting pages on Roman food, and winemaking in amphorae. They could be an addition to lessons on Cambridge Latin Course Book 1.

The wine first: The New York Times (you have to register, free) has a piece on an Italian winemaker who has gone back to using buried amphorae, such as you can see in the Boscoreale Villa. An extract:

Rejecting the modern trappings of the cellar, Mr. Gravner has reached back 5,000 years. He now ferments his wines in huge terra-cotta amphorae that he lines with beeswax and buries in the earth up to their great, gaping lips. Ancient Greeks and Romans would be right at home with him, yet his 2001 wines, his first vintage from the amphorae, which he is planning to release in September, are more vivacious and idiosyncratic than ever.

I wonder if Professor David West, who gave the ARLT a memorable evening of Horace readings and tasting of the best modern versions of old Roman wines, has caught up with this development.

Then the food. Pompeii has been putting on a season of Roman food, apparently. The best picture is with this version of the AP article, which begins thus:

ROME – Sauces made from fermented fish entrails. A quiche-like pastry shell filled with bay leaves and ricotta cheese. For dessert, peaches with aromatic cumin and honey.

Those tastes may not be for everyone’s palate, but the specialties of ancient Pompeii are being revived for a month at the site of the ruins by a research project intended to give new insights into how the Romans lived.

There's a different article by the director of the Science Museum of Virginia in the Richmond Times-Despatch:

On the Bay of Naples, Italy, a rare glimpse of Roman-era lifestyles lies frozen in time. Ash falls and pyroclastic flows destroyed and encapsulated humans and their culture.

The preservation of ingredients, cooking and dining were so complete that they are now the subject of a project, “De Gustibus” (about taste: from vegetable garden to table), that brings to life how food was raised and prepared 2,000 years ago.

Seldom do archaeologists have so rich an opportunity to learn what life was like among our predecessors.

A little knowledge ….

Here's a gentleman writing in The Scotsman:

Word of the week

GEORGE KEREVAN

referendum: Noun. 1: The submission of a proposed public measure or actual statute to a direct popular vote. 2: Such a vote. (Etymology: from the Latin, neuter gerundive of referre, to refer.) – American Heritage Dictionary. ….

Referendum first pops up in English circa 1847, chiefly in reference to Switzerland. Of course, the real question that needs a referendum is over what the plural of the word is in English. The Latin root is a gerundive. A gerundive is a form of a Latin verb, ending in -ndus and functioning as an adjective meaning “that should or must be done'”. So it has a no plural. Ergo, the plural of the English word referendum is not – repeat not – referenda. The correct form is referendums. So there.

Who is going to write in and tell Mr Kerevan that he is wrong, and that Latin adjectives do have plural forms? A nice exercise for your Latin class, perhaps! The class could point out that 'referenda' and 'referendums' both have a claim to be used, the former when more than one question is referred to the public at once, as in California at election time. They might also recommend the thoroughly Roman-based 'plebiscite', which has been used as an English word since 1533 and whose plural is not in doubt.

U2 wow them with Latin

Al Gore was among the audience, apparently, for a U2 gig in Boston. Here's the article.

And an extract:

U2 may have played a near replica of Tuesday's show, but fans didn't come to be surprised by classic and rare nuggets. They came to be lifted, to be overwhelmed by the power of rock 'n' roll, and that's what U2 does best. A deluge of anthemic rockers began the night, the grand “City of Blinding Lights'' folding into the somehow still fresh-sounding smash “Vertigo.'' A wonderful detour from the set list then reared its head with the Latin-spouting classic “Gloria,'' thrilling
the crazed, fist-pumping audience.