Coriolanus at The Globe

Radio 3 discussed the new production of Coriolanus at the Globe theatre in London this evening, with deep division between the critics whether Coriolanus is a political play or just about a blood-lust-filled man and his mother. The Daily Telegraph offers this appraisal:

Fresh blood at the Globe

(Filed: 12/05/2006)

Charles Spencer reviews Coriolanus at Shakespeare's Globe

Mark Rylance achieved great things during his decade at Shakespeare's Globe, above all in turning this magical place into a genuinely popular success. But there was a certain crankiness about him, too, and a roughness, or wilful perversity, about too many of the productions.

Now Dominic Dromgoole has taken over, late of the Bush Theatre and Oxford Stage Company, and a passionate Shakespearean as he reveals in his highly enjoyable new book Will and Me, which describes a lifelong obsession with the Bard.

It's a relief to welcome an artistic director to the Globe who actually believes that Shakespeare wrote the plays, as well as one who has expressed a robust distaste for excessively conceptual productions and self-advertising director's theatre. “Trust the play” appears to be Dromgoole's creed, and there is no better one when it comes to Shakespeare.

His first season looks a lively one, with Coriolanus followed by two further Roman plays, Titus Andronicus and Antony and Cleopatra, plus that infallible Shakespearean farce, The Comedy of Errors. There will also be two new plays, with Howard Brenton telling the story of Abelard and Heloise, and Simon Bent depicting the adventures of Long John Silver. The latter offers “bare flesh and filthy language”. As Peter Cook once observed in a similar context: “Don't we get enough of that sort of thing at home?”

Dromgoole leads from the front by directing Coriolanus himself, making full use of the Globe's audience in this big, public political play. The actors playing the Roman citizens are actually discovered among those standing in the yard, and when Coriolanus unwillingly and sarcastically solicits plebeian support for the consulship, he addresses the audience directly as if we held the key to his elevation. And, when Aufidius finally has Coriolanus killed, that too takes places among the groundlings, putting one in mind of the Hell's Angels murder among the crowd at the Altamont rock festival, as the Rolling Stones sang Sympathy for the Devil.

Both costumes and music in this production are authentically Jacobean, though the costumes come with Roman trimmings as they would have done in Shakespeare's day. And the action sweeps along at a fine old lick. What was really encouraging at the first night was the way the audience seemed to be hanging on to every word of the often-complex political debate, lively in its response, but never reducing the show to the level of a pantomime as has occasionally happened in the past.

Jonathan Cake, sometimes known as Jonathan Beefcake on account of his dark and rugged appearance, certainly looks the part of the proud patrician warrior Coriolanus, so useful to the Roman republic in time of war, such a liability in time of peace, with his inflammatory contempt for the plebs.

But, in the early scenes, his voice seemed surprisingly feeble, his delivery of the verse so rushed and muddled that the sense got mangled. I suspect this was a case of first-night nerves, as he grew impressively in power as the show wore on, movingly showing how this great hulk of a killing machine is also an emotionally stunted mummy's boy, desperate for maternal approval. The scene when he cracks up at the end, and finally acknowledges his emotions, is deeply moving.

Margot Leicester gives a superb performance as the manipulative matriarch, rejoicing in her son's battle injuries even as she warps his personality, and there's strong support from Robin Soans as that wiliest of politicians, Menenius, and Mo Sesay as Coriolanus's devious adversary, Tullus Aufidius.

In general, both ensemble acting and verse speaking seemed stronger than they did under Rylance, and it promises to be a highly rewarding summer at the Globe.

# Tickets: 020 7401 9919

New in paperback – Jonathan's book on Cicero

Slightly misleading title to this post – sorry. Our own ARLT vice president Jonathan Powell and good friend of ARLT Jeremy Patterson have edited this book, which is now out in paperback. Here are the details from OUP.

NEW IN PAPERBACK

Cicero the Advocate

Edited by Jonathan Powell and Jeremy Paterson
Price: £29.99 (Paperback)
ISBN-10: 0-19-929829-7
ISBN-13: 978-0-19-929829-7
Publication date: 13 April 2006
460 pages, 234mm x 156mm

Ordering
Individual customers:
order by phone, post, or fax

Teachers in UK and European schools (and FE colleges in the UK):
- order by phone, post, or fax

Reviews

  • 'Review from previous edition 'Cicero the Advocate – he's back, he's bad, and he's taking names!' Or so the voice-over for the trailer would growl, if this surprisingly feisty volume were a summer blockbuster coming to a movie screen near you . . . Not quite a decade after his collection Cicero the Philosopher helped make 1995 a watershed in the re-evaluation of that portion of the oeuvre, Jonathan Powell has joined with Jeremy Paterson to produce a worthy successor. The standard maintained is uniformly high, and excellence is not uncommon. We can hope that Oxford will provide a paperback version sooner rather than later, at a price teachers and even their students can actually afford. ' -Bryn Mawr Classical Review
  • 'Skilled editors and a team of experts offer what is effectively an `Oxford Companion to Cicero's Forensic Speeches' – and a boon companion it is . . . Highly recommended.' -Choice: Current Reviews for Academic Libraries

Description

  • Presents Cicero's speeches as examples of practical advocacy
  • An Introduction discusses general topics and sets the speeches in historical context
  • Analyses Cicero's rhetorical techniques, examining particular speeches
  • An Epilogue by a Lord Justice of Appeal compares ancient and modern advocacy

A collection of contributions by prominent Ciceronian scholars on Cicero's forensic speeches as examples of advocacy designed to secure a verdict, setting the speeches in the context of the Roman court system and of ancient rhetoric, discussing the nature of advocacy ancient and modern, analysing Cicero's various techniques of persuasion, and examining a number of speeches in detail as case studies.

Readership: Classicists, especially scholars and students in the field of Latin prose literature; historians of the Late Roman Republic; legal historians; students of rhetoric; aspiring or practising lawyers and advocates interested in the history of their profession.

Contents

  • Jonathan Powell and Jeremy Paterson: Introduction
  • I. Themes
    1. 1 Andrew Lintott: Legal Procedure in Cicero's Time
    2. 2 Jeremy Paterson: Self-Reference in Cicero's Forensic Speeches
    3. 3 Kathryn Lomas: A Volscian Mafia? Cicero and his Italian Clients in the Forensic Speeches
    4. 4 David Levene: Allusion in Cicero's Narratives
    5. 5 Jill Harries: Cicero and the Law
    6. 6 Andrew Riggsby: The Rhetoric of Character in the Roman Courts
    7. 7 Christopher Craig: Audience Expectations, Invective, and Proof
    8. 8 Michael Winterbottom: Cicero's Perorations
    9. II. Case Studies
    10. 9 Catherine Steel: Being Economical with the Truth: What Really Happened at Lampsacus (Verrines II 1)
    11. 10 Lynn Fotheringham: Repetition and Structure in a Civil Law Speech: The Pro Caecina
    12. 11 Christopher Burnand: The Advocate as a Professional: The Role of the Patronus in Cicero's Pro Cluentio
    13. 12 Dominic Berry: Literature and Persuasion in Pro Archia
    14. 13 Wilfried Stroh: De Domo sua: Legal Problem and Structure
    15. 14 Jeff Johnson: The Dilemma of Cicero's Speech for Ligarius
    16. Epilogue
    17. 15 John Laws: Cicero and the Modern Advocate

Authors, editors, and contributors

Edited by Jonathan Powell, Professor of Latin, Royal Holloway, University of London and Jeremy Paterson, Senior Lecturer in Ancient History, University of Newcastle upon Tyne

Contributors: Jonathan Powell, Royal Holloway, University of London Jeremy Paterson, University of Newcastle upon Tyne Andrew Lintott, University of Oxford Kathryn Lomas, University College London David Levene, University of Leeds Jill Harries, University of St Andrews Andrew Riggsby, University of Texas at Austin Christopher Craig, University of Tennessee at Knoxville Michael Winterbottom, University of Oxford Catherine Steel, University of Glasgow Lynn Fotheringham, University of Nottingham Christopher Burnand, Abingdon School Dominic Berry, University of Leeds Wilfried Stroh, University of Munich Jeff Johnson, Princeton University John Laws, Judge of the Court of Appeal

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.